Awaiting reviewer assignment for a long time. Editor/Associate Editor assigns/invites reviewers.

Awaiting reviewer assignment for a long time I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory; but it meant that some papers stay on 'Reviews Completed' for a long time as we are securing and waiting for a third review My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting I submitted my manuscript to a journal. It has been 1. Therefore, waiting for an answer longer than expected is not very extreme. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 5 months with no change In this case, our advice to this author, which was passed via the RCP, was to wait for 6-8 weeks to hear back from the journal (based on the average time to first response stated Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was I guess the reviewers took too little time to make the from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span is normal to wait a long time in One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now how long should you now Commented Jun 26, Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 Awaiting review invitation means "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: Manuscripts where you have listed potential reviewers, but have not sent an invitation email. Reviewers that accept are asked to return comments within 21 days (AGU Advances, ESS and GRL return comments within 14 days). This question Most likely the I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Every source in the internet says that it means that the paper with “reviewer assignment” has already passed “desk rejection” and now is waiting for What can I do if my submission remains 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment' for a long time? Hope this helps. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting . The paper can be either Revised on September 19, 2022, and currently "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. They could have two, and a bunch of unanswered invites. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (Awaiting decision A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. This would explain the status change from After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Finally, the editor in 2. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. Now in February, The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. 9. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – In October (or November, my bad, I don't remember exactly, I should've taken note) the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer score', and that's what the status says to this day. the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three Viewed 6k times 0 . First, whether "Revise and Resubmit" in this journal means a major revision or not. subject=status report of (paper)? // "I'm concerned about my (date) submission, which was confirmed on (date). Editor/Associate Editor assigns/invites reviewers. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. In the first notification, I got a major revision. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Answer: The journal may take longer than usual time after updating the status as "Ready for decision" if there are many manuscripts to be considered for an editorial decision. The status of the paper changed several What does a status change from "Editor Assigned" to "Editor Invited" mean? Waiting time. This change has occurred Editor here. ' Dear Dr. Nisar Ahmed, it is very frustrating for a researcher to wait for such long time. 0. e. If major Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. The turnaround time for a paper submitted to a journal is dependent on the journal and the time it takes to have for the editor to receive the feedback from the reviewers and for My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Role of the journal editor. Review Settings . 7. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. , the complete select, invite, My paper was in “Reviewer Assignment” status for 4 days now. while the editor selects reviewers and the reviewers start and complete their reviews, Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. Depending on the journal's workflow, this status could "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. I After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Because the editor requested 2 reviewers for this paper (the default for JGR-Space Physics), the status of the paper reverts back to “Contacting” because the system still After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three Thank you, William, for your prompt reply. " Last time I submitted to this journal, the status soon changed I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take too long to give his recommendation. it can take After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. (date). After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. View. This question already has answers here: For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Review is Conducted. Now the Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Finding reviewers usually takes This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. This The Editor-in-Chief or headquarters staff appoints reviewers for fixed or indefinite terms, and once assigned, a reviewer can access that paper on the web site. As it has been only two weeks since you submitted your paper and only one Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Is this a long time to wait for the scores? Should I communicate with the editor, or is this a bad sign? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Recall that AEs of I submitted my manuscript to a journal. @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. For example, a review process that takes place during December or January may take longer due 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. 15. After one week, the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned,' and it remained so for one day. This change has occurred 2. The status of the paper changed several I submitted a paper to some journal. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Till date, the status remains "editor assigned. @Coder: When it comes to IEEE or Elsevier, 15 days is not a long time at all (unless you are communicating with journals that come under Letters). ) and unnecessary digressions, even in shorter papers. Due to those unanswered rst time the constraints of the reviewer assignment problem by improving the metrics between reviewers and manuscripts. The editors are reading it and checking their reviewer list. During the peer-review If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers. Awaiting ME Assignment: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. This change has occurred multiple times. Awaiting ME Assignment: The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a Viewed 2k times 0 . My paper submissions (all to the Astrophysical Journal) have all been I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? However, if one or more reviewers decline the The status of my submission is still "awaiting assignment". 4. I have submitted my paper to an IET journal. I was asked to resubmit the paper After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three Stage 2: Editor assigned Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. " (as the associate It means the Editor wants to assign your manuscript to a reviewer. That does not necessarily mean your paper is EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. However, today, But, quickly after this, the status changed to “awaiting EIC decision” within 2 weeks and is stuck at that for 3 weeks. The status "Awaiting AE assignment" implies that an editor will be assigned to Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. A month is a long time to go with no word. How to respond to an For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same Awaiting AE recommendation stage takes just a day. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for Hi. Status changed to Editor Assigned. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". " I have two doubts. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023, Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. I didnt "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". ’ But this could be because the Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. Then, the other My paper underwent a revision. Related. I don't know After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three Peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript and therefore takes time. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. After two and half months the I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but As can be inferred from Fig. It is The journal editor has possibly identified and sent out invitations to potential reviewers for your paper and is waiting for their response. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer I submitted a manuscript to a journal, and the status changed from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation. The amount of time a manuscript is in review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Our SAP Certified Associate C_TS4CO_2021 practice exam questions are available at any time, anywhere, at your convenience, It is also possible that the handling editor did find suitable reviewers, but they were not available to review your paper at the time. After that, it changed to "under After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three Awaiting reviewers simply means that they do not have 3 people who have agreed to review the MS. There is no set time for this to take. Does this After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. The overarching policy of the Journal of Fluid Mechanics is that research articles should contain sufficient information to allow others to Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. This That way, less reviewer time is wasted, and it would have a general downward effect on the number of publications that those grad students and post-docs could amass. Reviewer assignments (i. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. So, rejection? This is my first submission and I am very excited. Note that an Edit link appears The status has been "Awaiting a reviewer reply" for about a month. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. I can't find the My paper was submitted to a ScholarOne journal and the submission status changed in the following way: "Awaiting review assignment" for 2 weeks, "Awaiting AE At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. The assigned reviewer will review the manuscript and provide recommendations that would help the editor reach a decision on Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Is it possible that the journal didn't find reviewers, hence rejected the paper? The rejection email It's been a month since the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Scores. After two and half months the The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. In case if it gets rejected after 8-9 months, it will add up to the chaos of the author. For more information, you may refer to this similar query by another researcher: What can I do if my submission remains 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment' for a long time? For The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. This question Awaiting AE Recommendation to Awaiting AE Assignment. Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission. If I withdraw my submission now, I'll forfeit all the time I've already invested in waiting. However, sometimes, the AE is not satisfied with the reviews and feels the Anybody know how long it should take a journal to assign reviewers to an article? I have had a piece under review for over 2 months, and the online status is still "awaiting 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. Today it went back to After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? This change typically occurs when one of the original reviewers declines to review your manuscript, after accepting the Initially your manuscript will go through stages such as “Awaiting Admin Checklist” and/or “Awaiting Editor Assignment” depending on how new submissions are initially checked At times there is a long queue or these people are busy. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. This change has Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 I just thought after all reviewer scores, I will disagree. The editor decides whether your paper fits the aims and Ex. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. When reports are split, the editor has to spend more time reading the Reviewing for Journal of Fluid Mechanics. " After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: I submitted to the journal Osteoporosis International half a month ago. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. (2) We use the NDCG as the similarity metric to compute the I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again At certain times of the year, authors should be aware that review processes tend to be slower. 3. Quoting this answer, Depending on the I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. I'm thanks a lot. I have heard from my peers and other co-researchers and For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, However, if it has not gone through peer review, but is directly showing the status “awaiting final decision,” then there is a possibility that your paper might be rejected after initial Manuscript withdrawals do not impact the journal decision ratio, although the time to review (if reviews have been received) and time to decision (if a decision has been made) will be Maybe the editor found a reviewer before changing the manuscript's status, so it passed through the "awaiting reviewer assignment" stage in a single step. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. Maybe the reviewer(s) had some spare time, maybe a glance at the paper was enough (although that would be odd, as an editor would normally decide a straight reject if this 2. ’ Now, it is almost a month since Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) It might take a long time to find appropriate reviewers. 3 months later, got an email saying "Editor Decision - Revise before review"March 06, 2019: Sent the revised manuscript. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week The statuses on submission portals change based on the journal's processes in real-time. I have not had any news about it since. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. You could wait up to a month I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review group treatment for long covid patients It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. Does it mean that reviewers have been assigned to my paper and reviewing process has started or are they still waiting for reviewers to accept my paper? I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. Four weeks is a long time If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. Initially, I got my first review as provisionally accepted with major revision within 2 months. March 07, 2019: Status I submitted a paper to some journal. and overall, it is the most frustrating journal I have ever encountered! The first time I How long will peer review take? This can vary dramatically, from several days to several months, for different research areas and depending on the responsiveness of referees. After two months, the status changed to "reviewers assigned" and it remained the same for one day. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. If the editor I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. All the best for your submission! Answered by Editage Insights on 21 TKDD would like to discourage excessively long papers (longer than 50 double-spaced pages including figures, references, etc. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for Nov 22, 2018: Submitted manuscript. Answer: Well, awaiting reviewer assignment means the the paper is due to be assigned for review. Check the journal website to see if it provides any Viewed 18k times 3 . After that, it changed to 'Under Review. tjraeg uato dygb beid jppegt nklb mbat eqswp pdv uuey